Codex Alexandrinus is one of the most important manuscripts of the Greek New Testament. Produced in the first half of the 400s, its readings have been known to European researchers ever since 1627, when it was entrusted to the king of England by Cyril Lucar.
Digital images of the New Testament portion of Codex A (Volume 4) have been placed online at the website of the British Library. Site-visitors can use the search-bar to search from page to page. Here is an index of the beginnings of each book, and other often-consulted passages:
List of Contents – 1v
Matthew
1:1-25:6 is all gone.
Mt. 25:7 – 2r –
Mt. 26:47
– 3v
Chapter-list
for Mark – 5v
Mk.1:1 –
6r
Mk 6:1 –
9r (“6” written in inner margin)
Mk. 9:1 –
11v (“9” written in inner margin)
Mk 12:1 –
14v (“12” written in outer margin)
Mk 14:1 –
16r
Mk 16:9 –
18r
Chapter-list
for Luke – 19r
Lk. 1:1 –
20r (Notice book-title in upper margin)
Lk. 4:1 –
22v (“4” written in inner margin)
Lk. 6:1 –
24v (“6” written in outer margin)
Lk. 8:1 –
26v (“8” written in outer margin)
Lk. 11:1
– 30r (“11” written in outer margin)
Lk. 15:1
– 33v (“15” in margin)
Lk.20:1 –
37r (“20” in margin)
Lk. 22:40
– 39r (SE portion)
Lk.24:1 –
40v (“24”in margin)
Chapter-list
for John – 42r
Jn. 1:1 –
42r
Jn. 3:1 – 43v (“3” in margin)
Jn. 5:1 –
45r (“5” in margin)
[Missing: 6:50 katabainwn – 8:52 [leg]eis]
Jn. 9:1 –
47r
Jn. 11:1
– 48v
Jn. 11:55
– 49r (SE section)
Jn. 14:1
– 51r (“14” in margin)
Jn. 18:1
– 53r (“18” in margin)
Jn. 20:1
– 54v (“20” in margin)
Acts 1:1
– 56r
Acts 6:1
– “6” in margin)
Acts 9:1
– 61v (“9” in margin)
Acts 12:1
– 63v (“12” in margin)
Acts 15:1
– 65v (“15” in margin)
Acts 20:1
– 69v (“20” in margin)
Acts 24:1
– 72v (“24” in margin)
Acts 27:1
– 74r (“27” in margin)
James 1 –
76r
First
Peter 1 – 78r
Second
Peter 1 – 80r
First
John 1 – 81v
Second
John – 83v
Third
John – 84r
Jude –
84r
Romans 1
– 85r
Romans 3
– 86r (“3” in margin)
Romans 8
– 88r (“8” in margin)
Romans 10
– 89r (“10” in margin)
Romans 12
– 90r (“12” in margin)
Romans 15
– 91r (“15” in margin)
First
Corinthians 1 – 92v
First
Corinthians 6 – 94r
First
Corinthians 9 – 95r
First
Corinthians 10 – 95v (“10” in margin)
First
Corinthians 13 – 97r (“13” in margin)
First Corinthians
15 – 98r (“15” in margin)
Second
Corinthians 1 – 99v
[Missing: 2 Cor. 4:13b gegramme[non] – 12:7 uperbolh]
Galatians
1 – 101v
Galatians
4 – 103r (“4” in margin)
Ephesians
1 – 104r
Philippians
1 – 107r
Colossians
1 – 108v
First
Thessalonians 1 – 110v
Second
Thessalonians 1 – 112r
Hebrews 1
– 113r
Hebrews 5
– 114v
Hebrews
10 – 116v
Hebrews
12 – 118r
First
Timothy 1 – 119r
Second
Timothy 1 – 121r
Titus 1 –
123r
Philemon
– 124r
Revelation
1 – 125r
Revelation
4 – 126r
Revelation
8 – 127v
Revelation
13 – 129r
Revelation
18 – 131r
Revelation
21 – 132v
First
Clement 1 – 134r
First
Clement 20 – 136r
First
Clement 51 – 140r (This is why we don’t use chemical reagents!)
First Clement 63 – 141v (This, too, is why we never use chemical
reagents!)
Second
Clement 1- 143r
3 comments:
Hey James, thanks for educating us on textual criticism. Quick question... how close is codex Alexandrinus from codex Vaticanus? I’m seeing some bizantine readings in Cyril of Alexandria. I wonder if those readings are more frequent in codex Alexandrinus than Vaticanus.
In the Gospels, they're not very close.
Vaticanus (the part from the 300s) doesn't even have Revelation.
I'd say they're not very close in other sections either, though I haven't attempted a direct comparison. If you have Swanson, maybe you could see something there.
Thanks James! By reading Jerome and Chrysostom, I noticed that their texts tend to be predominantly Byzantine in the gospels with some Alexandrian readings here and there but when it comes to the Pauline epistles, they seem to be making more use of Alexandrian readings. Codex A in that sense seems to be a potential good candidate to come close to what those fathers had in their manuscripts given that it is Byzantine in the gospels and acts and Alexandrian in the Pauline epistles. I am looking for manuscripts with this characteristic for their ability to witness to what was commonly used in the churches.
Post a Comment