Mark 16:9-20 in Sinai Gr. 212. |
Let’s take a closer look at the
excerpts from the New Testament that this manuscript contains. There are 30 excerpts in all, all but one of
which are preceded by a rubric (a note written in red) that identifies the
purpose or occasion for each lection, and/or the book from which the lection is
taken. I have given extra details here for
only a few of the rubrics.
The first
eight lections form an eight-part series of lections about Jesus’ post-resurrection
appearances: (1) Matthew 28:1-9. (2) Mark
16:1-8. (3) Luke 24:1-12.
(4) John 20:1-18. (5) Matthew
28:9b-20. (6) Mark 16:9-20.
[27v-32v] (7) Luke 24:13-35. (8) John
21:1-14. [44v]. (This eight-part series, which resembles the 11-part Heothina series in the Byzantine Lectionary, represents a feature in an ancient lection-cycle used at Jerusalem.)
The rest of
the excerpts are:
Luke 10:38-42.
Matthew
16:13-20
Matthew
5:17-24 (without εικη in 5:22)
Matthew
10:1-15 (For the Apostles) [62v]
Matthew
10:16-22
Matthew
10:24-33
John 12:24-26
(For Saint Stephen) [78r]
Matthew 5:13-16
Matthew
25:1-13
Matthew 5:1-12a
John
10:11-16
Matthew
16:24b-27 (For the Archangels) [92v]
John 5:19b-24 (For the Sleepers)
Matthew
11:25-30
Hebrews
13:10-16
Hebrews
1:13-2:4
First
Corinthians 4:9-15 (For the Apostles)
First
Corinthians 12:27-13:3 (reading καυθήσωμαι in 13:3)
Romans
5:1-5. [105v] (reading εχομεν
in 5:1)
Second
Corinthians 4:7-12.
Hebrews 4:14-5:6.
First
Thessalonians 4:13-18. (The rubric for
this lection is missing, an unartistic secondary hand has added From Thessalonians in black ink.)
Additional information about the rubrics and marginalia in Sin. Gr. 212 can be found in Daniel Galadza’s informative article Two Greek, Ninth-century Sources of the Jerusalem Lectionary: Sinai Gr. 212 and Sinai Gr. N.E. ΜΓ 11, in Bollettino Della Badia Greca De Grottaferrata (2014).
When microfilm-pictures were taken of Sinai Gr. 212 in 1950, the manuscript was assigned a production-date in the 600s. However, considering the breathing-marks and accents that accompany the text, the main upper Greek writing’s production-date
should probably be assigned to the late 700s or early 800s. The text of a Greek Psalter that was sacrificed to provide writing-material for the lectionary-text (which is particularly apparent in the new photographs at the Sinai Palimpsests Project website) may date to the 500s.
This is
just one manuscript – and yet, its discovery is like discovering fragments from
nine New Testament books, all older than 90% of our extant New Testament
manuscripts. (Actually, ten
New Testament books, inasmuch as what appears to be a sort of tightly written heading on the
first page is the contents of Acts 5:38b-39.)
What type of text does this witness display? Although one should not extrapolate too much
from one scoop out of the ice-cream bucket, the following comparison in Matthew
28 is instructive:
2 – σισμος,
agreeing with À.
2 – και
before προσελθων, agreeing with B À.
2 – απο της θύρας but not του μνημείου,
agreeing with A C K M Δ Π W Y. A
supplemental hand has supplied του μνημείου.
3 – ως
instead of ωσει, agreeing with B À* D K Π.
4 – ως
instead of ωσει, agreeing with B À D A L W.
6 – does not have ὁ Κς at the end of the verse,
agreeing with B À
Θ 33.
8 – απελθουσαι
instead of εξελθουσαι, agreeing with
B À
C L Θ.
9 – does not have the first part of the verse (up to
αυτου), agreeing with B À D W Θ.
9 – ὁ before Ις, agreeing with D L W Y Θ.
9 – υπηντησεν
instead of απηντησεν, agreeing with
B À*
C Π Υ Θ.
10 – μαθηταις instead of αδελφοις, agreeing with
157.
10 – κακει instead of και εκει, agreeing with B
D L M.
14 – does not have αυτον after πείσομεν, agreeing with
Β À
Θ 33.
17 – does not have αυτω after προσεκύνησαν, agreeing
with Β À
D 33.
19 – ουν
after Πορευθέντες, agreeing with B W Δ Θ Π.
20 – does not have Αμην at the end of the verse,
agreeing with B À
A* D W.
Thus, in Matthew 28, Sin. Gr. 212 is a strong Alexandrian witness. It should be a consistently cited witness
of the first order.
[Readers are encouraged to explore the embedded links in this post to find additional study-materials.]
[Readers are encouraged to explore the embedded links in this post to find additional study-materials.]
4 comments:
What! Mark 16:1-8 was a lection that ended with a telos-symbol?
So why is it important? Because it is older than most Byzantine MSS? Anything found in Egypt is not important in my book, the home of Gnosticism and doctored MSS.
Dear Ok media man,
That is an attitude known as "prejudiced."
Yet Kurt Aland gave a similar warning!
The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism (originally 1987)
Kurt and Barbara Aland
https://books.google.com/books?id=6tb7EAAAQBAJ&pg=PA59
"We should not forget that apart from 0212 (found at Dura Europus). all the early witnesses listed above on p. 57 are from Egypt, where the hot, dry sands preserved the papyri through the centuries (similar climatic conditions are found in the Judaean desert where papyri have also been discovered). From other major centers of the early Christian church nothing has survived. This raises the question whether and to what extent we can generalize from the Egyptian situation. Egypt was distinguished from other provinces of the Church, so far as we can judge, by the early dominance of gnosticism; this was not broken until about A.D. 200. when Bishop Demetrius succeeded in reorganizing the diocese and establishing communications with the other churches. Not until then do we have documentary evidence of the church in Egypt, although undoubtedly not only the gnostic but also the broader Church was represented there throughout the whole period. At almost the same time the Catechetical School of Alexandria was instituted as the first "Christian university."
What Aland leaves out is that gnostic influence continued, influencing the papyri copying, whether or not gnosticism was "dominant" in Alexandria.
Plus the gnosticism laid down a corpus of corruption throughout Egypt, used for continuing copying.
Steven Avery
https://linktr.ee/stevenavery
Post a Comment