Showing posts with label NA28. Show all posts
Showing posts with label NA28. Show all posts
Tuesday, February 24, 2026

Second Peter 3:10 - A Step Backwards in NA28

›
              Has the church lost the original text of Second Peter 3:10?             “Doubtless” was Hort’s answer in 1881.      His note...
Tuesday, May 15, 2018

N-A in 2018 and W-H in 1881: How Similar?

›
Eldon Jay Epp Eldon Jay Epp , in his 1974 essay, The Twentieth Century Interlude in New Testament Textual Criticism (published in the...
5 comments:
Wednesday, August 2, 2017

Some Shortcomings of the Nestle-Aland Apparatus

›
          “It is certain that the original wording is found either in the text or in the apparatus” – the apparatus being the collection ...
15 comments:
Saturday, January 14, 2017

Nestle-Aland 28: Much Ado About Even Less

›
          In the previous post, I concluded that although it has been claimed that the new edition of the Nestle-Aland compilation of the ...
Thursday, January 12, 2017

Nestle-Aland 28: Much Ado About Almost Nothing

›
          It has been almost four years since the release of the 28th edition of the Nestle-Aland Novum Testamentum Graece , the first revi...
3 comments:
Tuesday, January 3, 2017

Nestle-Aland in Mark 11: Alexandrian or Eclectic?

›
          In the preceding three posts, I observed that even though the Nestle-Aland/ UBS compilation of the Greek New Testament is ofte...

Nestle-Aland in John 20: Alexandrian or Eclectic?

›
          In the two preceding posts, I showed that the Nestle-Aland/ UBS compilation is almost entirely Alexandrian in Galatians 1 and in...
9 comments:
Monday, January 2, 2017

Nestle-Aland in Luke 15: Alexandrian or Eclectic?

›
          Is the Nestle-Aland compilation basically a slightly tweaked presentation of the Alexandrian Text, relying very heavily on Code...