Showing posts with label Daniel Wallace. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Daniel Wallace. Show all posts
Tuesday, December 31, 2019

GA 804 Looked Like a Gospels-Manuscript - Except For This!

›
            In October 2014, I wrote about GA 804 , a small Gospels-manuscript from the 1000s with a text that often agrees with K and Π.  T...
3 comments:
Tuesday, September 18, 2018

GA 1333 and the Story of the Adulteress

›
            It is difficult to exaggerate the extent of misinformation that is circulating in various commentaries regarding the pericop...
6 comments:
Saturday, November 25, 2017

Evidence That Demands a Rewrite

›
             Evidence That Demands a Verdict , by Josh McDowell, has been a major handbook for Christian apologetics ever since its initi...
4 comments:
Saturday, November 11, 2017

If In Doubt, Sort It Out

›
  Curious incidents in the Byzantine Text .           “If in doubt, don’t throw it out.”   That is the way in which Dan Wallace has as...
8 comments:
Thursday, September 14, 2017

Fact-checking Wallace: GA 2346, 2812, and 137

›
             In two earlier posts, we saw that minuscules 138, 264, 1221 do not contain an asterisk at Mark 16:9 to convey scribal doubt ab...
1 comment:
Wednesday, September 13, 2017

Fact-checking Wallace: GA 264 and 1221

›
            In the previous post, we saw that although Daniel Wallace has claimed (in Perspectives on the Ending of Mark:  4 Views , publis...
1 comment:
Tuesday, September 12, 2017

Fact-checking Wallace: GA 138

›
            “Second, the scribe might simply place an asterisk or obelisk in the margin, indicating doubt about these verses.  Such a symbo...
4 comments: