Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Commentary. Show all posts
Thursday, September 14, 2017

Fact-checking Wallace: GA 2346, 2812, and 137

›
             In two earlier posts, we saw that minuscules 138, 264, 1221 do not contain an asterisk at Mark 16:9 to convey scribal doubt ab...
1 comment:
Saturday, September 2, 2017

The Stavros Collection - More MSS at Jerusalem

›
            Among the manuscripts kept by the Jerusalem Patriarchate is the Hagios Stavros collection, which formerly (as far as I can tel...
Friday, August 25, 2017

Fortunatianus Speaks!

›
            Fortunatianus’ Latin commentary on the Gospels, written c. 350 – about the same time as the production of Codex Sinaiticus, “Th...
1 comment:
Friday, December 2, 2016

Defend Mark 16:9-20 and John 7:53-8:11 This Christmas

›
          Are you looking for a Christmas present for someone who rejects, or is unsure about, Mark 16:9-20 and John 7:53-8:11 ?  Do you kn...
Monday, May 9, 2016

Ending Inaccurate Comments about the Ending of Mark

›
            Last month, Larry Hurtado, at his blog , recommended the late Bruce Metzger’s A Textual Commentary on the Greek New Testament , ...
8 comments:
Tuesday, May 3, 2016

Minuscule 304, Theophylact, and the Ending of Mark

›
          Minuscule 304 is a medieval Greek manuscript which contains a commentary on Matthew and Mark, along with the text of those two G...
1 comment: