tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post4509748279434585609..comments2024-03-20T12:35:12.828-04:00Comments on The Text of the Gospels: A Surprise from Oxyrhynchus: 069, a Fragment of MarkJames Snapp Jrhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-56821503437556245592018-01-27T17:58:52.156-05:002018-01-27T17:58:52.156-05:00As I have mentioned elsewhere on this blog, 0171 a...As I have mentioned elsewhere on this blog, 0171 also supports the Byzantine Text, primarily in its inclusion of the "Western non-Interpolation" of Luke 22:43-44. Ironically, the Alands categorize it as "an early (secondary?) form of the D text" a (which ms Larry Hurtado [https://larryhurtado.files.wordpress.com/2018/01/second-third-century-christian-texts.pdf] inaccurately lists as containing Matthew 10:17-23,25,32 and Luke 22:54-56,62,64). The Wikipedia page for 0171 shows photos and transcriptions of the actual text of all three fragments of 0171, for those who can't trust the word of an eminent NT scholar on something as basic as the contents of a NT manuscript. <br />I am among those who edited 0171's transcription. Anyone is free to check it against the photos. Daniel Buckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02600146498880358592noreply@blogger.com