tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post385639779648543621..comments2024-03-20T12:35:12.828-04:00Comments on The Text of the Gospels: Luke 23:34a - Answering the Apologists (Part 2)James Snapp Jrhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comBlogger14125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-2867250781664135392022-06-08T15:47:55.203-04:002022-06-08T15:47:55.203-04:00There is also an article with full citations in Ev...There is also an article with full citations in EvidenceforChristianity website that supports Mr James Snapp Jr research here:<br /><br />https://evidenceforchristianity.org/is-luke-2334a-part-of-the-original-book-of-luke/D.Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00938494878195924949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-54780748536826423472022-06-02T15:30:08.711-04:002022-06-02T15:30:08.711-04:00Also, pardon me to come back at this. I already as...Also, pardon me to come back at this. I already asked Mr James Snapp Jr and he confirmed to me that it (The prayer) didn't floating around on different manuscripts and locations.<br /><br />For further, you can also read this research paper by Nathan Eubank regarding this. It's really extensive and also run deeper into the examination:<br />https://www.academia.edu/2190430/_A_Disconcerting_Prayer_On_the_Originality_of_Luke_23_34a_Journal_of_Biblical_Literature_129_2010_521-536<br /><br />Also a research paper by Wesley Huff which did the same here:<br />https://www.academia.edu/35543936/Forgiveness_in_Luke_Acts_A_Close_Examination_of_the_Passion_Saying_of_Luke_23_34a_and_the_Prayer_of_Stephen_During_His_Martyrdom_in_Acts_7_60<br /><br />Their research supported what Mr James Snapp explained on both of his posts (Part 1 & 2) here.D.Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00938494878195924949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-78006916420242887942022-05-22T17:34:01.739-04:002022-05-22T17:34:01.739-04:00Not sure how to not post anonymously on this blog,...Not sure how to not post anonymously on this blog, but for more information about my understanding that Paul has Luke in mind in 2Co 8:18 in the post above, please see the first several paragraphs at my website https://inductivebible.org/?page_id=1523. CB. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14301917386842495222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-68818723163370187082022-05-22T17:10:47.185-04:002022-05-22T17:10:47.185-04:00Thank you for your scholarly contribution to this ...Thank you for your scholarly contribution to this topic. Another possibility that strikes me as at least plausible is that Luke, as a historian, could easily have known about the tradition and possibly omitted it from his account because he couldn’t substantiate it. However, because there is good reason to believe that Paul perhaps refers to Luke in 2Co 8:18 as “the brother whose fame in the things of the gospel has spread through all the churches”, it is possible that after penning the gospel bearing his name that Luke made many copies for distribution to the churches, from which his fame came. In the course of making those copies, is it not conceivable that various edits were made, just as authors may do today as new information becomes available that may update their work? Hence, it seems possible to me that later copies from Luke’s own hand included the statement after he became convinced of its authenticity. That's probably not very satisfying to some people's theology of scripture, but it seems both reasonable and human, and would easily explain the omission from some early manuscripts. Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14301917386842495222noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-80310676157469902772022-05-20T13:10:16.078-04:002022-05-20T13:10:16.078-04:00Luke 23:34a - Answering the Apologists (Part 1):
h...Luke 23:34a - Answering the Apologists (Part 1):<br />https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/04/luke-2334a-answering-apologists-part-1.html?m=1D.Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00938494878195924949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-16420626849530342832022-05-20T13:08:57.273-04:002022-05-20T13:08:57.273-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.D.Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00938494878195924949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-90476837179248420252022-04-13T11:34:11.367-04:002022-04-13T11:34:11.367-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.D.Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00938494878195924949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-37327705131293834532022-04-13T10:47:13.063-04:002022-04-13T10:47:13.063-04:00This comment has been removed by the author.D.Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00938494878195924949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-23729230154027118962022-02-22T16:54:42.034-05:002022-02-22T16:54:42.034-05:00To be fair, it's approved that the saying matc...To be fair, it's approved that the saying matched with the gospel of Luke theological theme and connecting theme Luke trying to do in Acts. Even Bart Ehrman, the skeptic, agree with the theory that this is likely not an addition, but rather removal because of anti-Judaic sentiment. <br /><br />https://ehrmanblog.org/did-jesus-pray-father-forgive-them-from-the-cross/D.Lhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00938494878195924949noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-39419677125207166032020-05-18T20:51:25.469-04:002020-05-18T20:51:25.469-04:00Thanks very much, James. That removed my doubt.Thanks very much, James. That removed my doubt.Steve Millerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09792648780108490231noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-39898703581523670252019-03-27T22:49:20.062-04:002019-03-27T22:49:20.062-04:00Isn't it true that the saying floats about in ...Isn't it true that the saying floats about in different manuscripts of the different Gospels (not just in Luke) and at different locations? If so, doesn't that suggest it's not part of Luke's autograph?<br /><br />Also, just because a church father quotes the saying, it doesn't necessarily mean he's quoting any of the Gospels or even specifically the Gospel of Luke. Unless he indicates he's quoting a Gospel it's possible that he's citing a claimed or well known Dominical agraphon.ANNOYED PINOYhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00714774340084597206noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-82977562054307305342017-10-20T18:45:54.835-04:002017-10-20T18:45:54.835-04:00Thanks man, It requires a brotherly love. Pray f...Thanks man, It requires a brotherly love. Pray for Sir James White. <br />God bless you guysAnonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/15772523434030171856noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-78363765509800671552017-04-16T19:36:21.838-04:002017-04-16T19:36:21.838-04:00Another homerun for Jesus and his word. Thanks Ja...Another homerun for Jesus and his word. Thanks James. You should debate mr James White on some of these matters; and while you're at it throw Dr. Dan Wallace in the mix. The body of christ needs your counter-balance to the current text-critical stant that embraces all things said by Metzger and Aland.Ken Ganskiehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02040919525390779050noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-76944969867851428912017-04-14T21:39:23.027-04:002017-04-14T21:39:23.027-04:00This was a great exposition, James. Thanks for thi...This was a great exposition, James. Thanks for this amazing research. Waynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00310372386939711273noreply@blogger.com