tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post3763203024961702598..comments2024-03-20T12:35:12.828-04:00Comments on The Text of the Gospels: A Textual Mystery: The Case of the Adulteress and the Repeated VerseJames Snapp Jrhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-72417815995242954462020-05-27T21:02:40.813-04:002020-05-27T21:02:40.813-04:00Hi James,
What do you make of Δ (037)? There we h...Hi James,<br /><br />What do you make of Δ (037)? There we have Jo.7:52, then the first 25% or so of 8:12, then a blank space that is almost large enough to fit the PA, (although it could fit John 8:2/3-11,) and then 8:12 again, and this time it's complete.<br /><br />Since it's an old post, I understand if you don't want (or don't have time) to respond. Either way I'll check back in a few days. Thank you!<br /><br />Matthew M. Rosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16314585538959945496noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-54639646765654694612015-11-04T10:06:58.532-05:002015-11-04T10:06:58.532-05:00James, I want to get your book on this and study i... James, I want to get your book on this and study it further. I just read John chapter 8 this week in my Greek New Testament. It really blessed me. I know it's the truth! Waynehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00310372386939711273noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-70922527344178214192015-10-08T02:48:45.851-04:002015-10-08T02:48:45.851-04:00Archepoimenfollower,
I *am* being kind.
The exp...Archepoimenfollower, <br /><br />I *am* being kind.<br /><br />The explanation that I gave for the repetition of John 8:12 in MS 115 is a thousand times more plausible that the silly story that Dr. Wallace offered. I am confident that after taking the evidence into careful consideration, Dr. Wallace will agree that the repetition of John 8:12 in MS 115 is a lectionary-based format-adjustment, created so that both the Pentecost-lection and the lection for the Thursday of the fourth week after Easter would each form one uninterrupted block of text. <br /><br />James Snapp, Jr.<br /> James Snapp Jrhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-55923528425228406812015-10-05T10:25:08.291-04:002015-10-05T10:25:08.291-04:00Your explanation of the reason for the duplication...Your explanation of the reason for the duplication is plausible but no more so than Dr. Wallace's! Both of you are conjecturing how something may have occurred! Neither one of you needs to dishonest for you to disagree. One of the disappointments that I have with the current interaction among those scholars who disagree about the priority of certain manuscripts or textual clusters is the unnecessary accusations that are made about scholars who take a different view! Can we not disagree as children of the King and still show kindness?<br /><br />TimArchepoimenfollowerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04498234518466096416noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-9358509535516292402015-10-04T02:53:32.341-04:002015-10-04T02:53:32.341-04:00In his annotations in his *The Soveriegn Creator H...In his annotations in his *The Soveriegn Creator Has Spoken* Pickering shows how many MSS have a variant and the Alexandrian variant is used anyway. That is just sheer prejudice. I also noticed how Wallace sidestepped your remarks about his statement in a video. These guys are not intellectually honest. And solid work and research, James. I will read this several more times. Thanks.<br />John Podgorneyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16454541136553094470noreply@blogger.com