tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post282782200840596336..comments2024-03-20T12:35:12.828-04:00Comments on The Text of the Gospels: Meet GA 804: A Pocketful of SurprisesJames Snapp Jrhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09493891380752272603noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-45835252823577410932018-10-23T15:26:14.484-04:002018-10-23T15:26:14.484-04:00Thanks, James, for this service. Knowledge of the ...Thanks, James, for this service. Knowledge of the manuscripts continues to show that liturgical use of Scripture copies caused Alexandrian scribes to delete and Byzantine scribes to add. I'd be interested in a similar study of late Alexandrian mss, to determine what caused them to differ from the Great Codices.Daniel Buckhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/02600146498880358592noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6346409181794331060.post-89340907363413140002018-10-21T13:31:18.856-04:002018-10-21T13:31:18.856-04:00I found one divergence from both K and Π later in ...I found one divergence from both K and Π later in Matthew that might be worth noting: At the end of Matt 25:30, 804 adds the lectionary flourish ταυτα λεγων, εφωνει, Ο εχων ωτα ακουειν, ακουετω.<br /><br />It's not the only continuous-text manuscript to do so here (the uncials Y, Γ, and Ω and Family 13 feature the addition, while other minuscules place the addition after v. 29), but it is a relatively rare feature nevertheless.Joey McCollumhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17352192479713307345noreply@blogger.com